Issue

Vol. 8 (2025): Sustainable Science and Resources

Date Log

Submitted
17 January 2025
Published
16 June 2025
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Women-Owned Agribusinesses in South Africa- Gauteng Province

https://doi.org/10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2025.8002
Phindile Cebekhulu-Msomi
Milpark Business School
Shamila Singh
University of South Africa

Corresponding Author(s) : Phindile Cebekhulu-Msomi

phindimsomi@hazilegroup.co.za

Sustainability Science and Resources, Vol. 8 (2025): Sustainable Science and Resources

Abstract

Women-owned agribusinesses in Gauteng, South Africa face significant challenges in leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies for sustainable growth to understand the influence  on business expansion and profitability to design targeted interventions.This study examines the impact of Industry 4.0 on women-owned agribusinesses in Gauteng, South Africa, using a survey of 135 female farmers to identify key factors and strategies for growth.


 


A survey was distributed through Google Forms to gather quantitative data from 135 female farmers. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including Spearman's rank correlation and ordinal regression, were used to analyse the data.


 


The study found that women-owned agribusinesses face significant financial challenges, with 48.1% reporting losses or no profit in 2022 compared to 2018. Only 9.6% of businesses reported gross profits above R200,000, indicating that very few women-owned agribusinesses were able to reach high profitability levels. The study also found that funding, market accessibility, and agricultural skills are the three most important factors for business expansion, with 73.3% of participants considering funding extremely important. Additionally, the study found a weak positive correlation between the use of Industry 4.0 technology and gross profit margins, suggesting that technology adoption is important but not the primary driver of profitability.


 


Women-owned agribusinesses in Gauteng face significant financial difficulties, with a majority reporting losses or low profitability. Tailored interventions considering demographic factors and leveraging the potential of technology are needed for sustainable growth. The study provides valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by women-owned agribusinesses to navigate the impact of Industry 4.0. The findings highlight the importance of focused support in areas like funding, market access, and skill development to improve the expansion and sustainability of these businesses.


Key Words:  Food security, Industry 4.0, Sustainable Growth, Technology Adoption, Women-owned agribusinesses, Economic empowerment, Smart technologies, Automation

Keywords

Food security Industry 4.0 Sustainable Growth Technology Adoption Women- owned agribusinesses Economic empowerment Smart technologies Automation
Cebekhulu-Msomi, P., & Singh, S. (2025). The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Women-Owned Agribusinesses in South Africa- Gauteng Province. Sustainability Science and Resources, 8, 15–37. https://doi.org/10.55168/ssr2809-6029.2025.8002
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Areal, F., J., and Pede, V., O. (2023) Editorial: Evaluating the adoption and impacts of agricultural technologies. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7: 1340035.doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1340035
  2. Alhammadi, A., Alsyouf, I Semeraro, C., & Obaideen, K., (2024). The role of industry 4.0 in advancing sustainability development: A focus review in the United Arab Emirates. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 18 (2024) 100708.
  3. Armanda, D. T., Guinée, J. B., & Tukker, A. ,2019, ‘The second green revolution: innovative urban agriculture’s contribution to food security and sustainability – a review’, Global Food Security, 22, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.002
  4. Aryal., J., P., Franworth., C., R., Khurana., R., Rahut., D., B. (2020). Does women’s participation in agricultural technology adoption decisions affect the adoption of climate‐smart agriculture? Insights from Indo‐Gangetic Plains of India. Review of Development Economics 24(3). DOI: 10.1111/rode.12670.
  5. Ames, H., Glenton, C. & Lewin, S. 2019. Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis:
  6. a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination
  7. communication. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4.
  8. Armanda, D. T., Guinée, J. B., & Tukker, A. ,2019, ‘The second green revolution: innovative urban agriculture’s contribution to food security and sustainability – a review’, Global Food Security, 22, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.002
  9. Bajaj., N. (2024). rhttps://blog.searchmyexpert.com/ai-in-agriculture/AI in Agric
  10. ISBN: 978-1-119-56124-8.
  11. Bougie, R. & Sekaran, U., 2019. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons ISBN: 978-1-119-56124-8
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. , 2019, ‘Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis’, Qualitative Research
  13. in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
  14. Bryan, E., Alvi, M., Huyer, S., & Ringler, C. (2023). ‘Addressing Gender Inequalities and
  15. Strengthening Women’s Agency for Climate-Resilient and Sustainable Food Systems’, CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform Working Paper #013. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/129709
  16. Clercq, M. D., Vats, A., & Biel, A. ,2018, ‘Agriculture 4.0: The Future of Farming Technology’, The World Government Summit, Dubai. https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org
  17. Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139.
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  19. Cricelli, L., Mauriello, R., Strazzullo, S., & Camilleri, M., A. (2024). Assessing the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on the social sustainability of agrifood companies. Business Strategy and the Environment 33(7). DOI: 10.1002/bse.3874
  20. Da Silveira, F., & Amaral, F. ,2022, ‘Agriculture 4.0.’ , Encyclopedia of Smart Agriculture Technologies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89123-7_207-1.
  21. da Silveira, F., Barbedo, J., G., A., da Silva, S., L., C., & Amaral., F., G. (2023). Proposal for a framework to manage the barriers that hinder the development of agriculture 4.0 in the agricultural production chain,Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 214,108281,ISSN 0168-1699, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108281.
  22. Dufva, T., & Dufva, M. ,2019, ‘Grasping the future of the digital society. Futures, 107, 17-28. Sustainability Science and Resources, Vol. 8:2, 2025, pp. 15 - 37 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.11.001.
  23. Fanzo, J., Covic, N., Dobermann, A., Henson, S., Herrero, M., Pingali, P., & Staal, S. (2020). A research vision for food systems in the 2020s: Defying the status quo. Global Food Security, 26, Article 100397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100397.
  24. Field, A. (2017). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (North American Ed.). Sage Publications
  25. Fischer, G., Wittich, S., Malima, G., Sikumba, G., Lukuyu, B., Ngunga, D., Rugalabam, J. (2018). Gender and mechanisation: Exploring the sustainability of mechanised forage chopping in Tanzania, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 64, Pages 112-122, ISSN 0743-0167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.012.
  26. Gabriel, A., Gandorfer, M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture—an inventory in a european small-scale farming region. Precision Agric 24, 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1.
  27. Gadanakis, Y. (2024). Advancing farm entrepreneurship and agribusiness management for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture, 14(8), Article 1288. DOI:10.3390/agriculture14081288.
  28. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. 2021, Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Greencape (2022). Sustainable agriculture market intelligence report. https://greencape.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AGRI_MIR_29_3_22_FINAL-3.pdf /10/AGRI_MIR_29_3_22_FINAL-3.pdf
  30. Hassoun, A., Boukid, F., Pasqualone, A., Bryant, C., J., García García, G., Parra-Lo ́pez, C., Jagtap, S., Trollman, H., Cropotova, J., & Francisco J. Barba, F., J (2022). Emerging trends in the agri-food sector: Digitalisation and shift to plant-based diets. Current Research in Food Science 5 (2022) 2261–2269
  31. Idowu, O. B., Ajah, J., & Fadiji, T. O. ,2021, ‘Gender use of information and communication technologies among agricultural extension agents in north-central Nigeria’, Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Abuja, Nigeria.
  32. Jaggers., J., W., & Loomis., A., M. (2020). Research at Work: Sampling, Central Tendency, and Causation. Sage Journals. Volume 101, Issue 4
  33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420913
  34. Latino, M. E., Corallo, A., Menegoli, M., & Nuzzo, B. (2023). Agriculture 4.0 as Enabler of Sustainable Agri-Food: A Proposed Taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(10), 3678–3696. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3101548
  35. Lewandowska, A., Ullah, Z., AlDhaen, F. S., AlDhaen, E., & Yakymchuk, A. (2023). Enhancing Organisational Social Sustainability: Exploring the Effect of Sustainable Leadership and the Moderating Role of Micro-Level CSR. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511853
  36. Li, W., ClarK., B., , Taylor., J., A., Kendall., H., , Jones., G., Li., Z., Jin., S., Zhao., C., Yang., G., Shuai., C., Cheng., X., Chen., J., Yang., H., & Frewer., L., J. (2020). A hybrid modelling approach to understanding adoption of precision agriculture technologies in Chinese cropping systems Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 172, May 2020, 105305.
  37. López-Concepción, A., Gil-Lacruz, A. I., & Saz-Gil, I. (2022). Stakeholder engagement, CSR development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2170.
  38. Martin, T., Gasselin, P., Hostiou, N., Feron, G., Laurens, L., Purseigle, F., & Ollivier, G. (2022). Robots and transformations of work in farm: a systematic review of the literature and a research agenda. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(4).
  39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00796-2.
  40. Martens, K.; Zscheischler, J. (2022). The Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Value Chain: Discourses on Opportunities, Challenges and Controversial Perspectives on Governance Approaches. Sustainability,14,3905. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14073905
  41. Martínez, A., M., Santos-Corral, M., J., de Gortari, R., & Peñalva, L. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges for the Adoption of Industry 4.0 in Mexico. UNAM / Plaza Y Valdes. ISBN: 978-607-30-7670-8.
  42. Miranda, J., Ponce, P., Molina, A., & Wright, P. (2019). Sensing, smart and sustainable
  43. technologies for Agri-Food 4.0. Computers in Industry, 108, 21–36.
  44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.02.002.
  45. Neuendorf, K., A., (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In book: Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology. DOI: 10.4324/9781315517971-21
  46. Mulema, A.A., Jogo, W., Damtew., E., Mekonnen, K., & Thorne, P., 2019, ‘Women farmers’ participation in the agricultural research process: implications for agricultural sustainability in Ethiopia’, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1569578
  47. Ndandula, S., (2021). Women in Agriculture: The Unexplored Challenge. https://www.institute.leadersofafrica.org/analysis/confronting-barriers-to-gender-equity-in-africa-challenges-facing-women-in-the-agricultural-space/
  48. Prion., S., R., & Haerling., K., A. (2020). Making Sense of Methods and Measurements: Simple Linear Regression. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 48, Pages 94-95, ISSN 1876-1399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.07.004.
  49. Rahman, M.M.; Huq, H. (2023). Implications of ICT for the Livelihoods of Women Farmers: A Study in the Teesta River Basin, Bangladesh. Sustainability,15, 14432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914432.
  50. Rana., J., Gutierrez., P., L., L., & Oldroyd., J. (2021). Quantitative Methods. In book: Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance Edition: Springer Reference Living Edition, Chapter: Section: Methodology. Publisher: Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_460-1.
  51. Ren, Y., Feng, H., & Gao, T. , 2023, ‘The Effect of Empowerment on the Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Technology in the Loess Plateau of China’, Land, 12(8), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081502.
  52. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., Dessein, J., Scotti, I., & Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003
  53. Shaw, J., D., Tangirala., S., Vissa, B., & Rodell., J. (2018). New Ways of Seeing: Theory Integration across Disciplines. Academy of Management Journal 61(1): 1-4.
  54. Sheeba, D., & Christopher, B. P. (2024). A five-decade journey of women dynamics in global agriculture. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope (IRJMS), 2024; 5(3): 51-69. DOI: 10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i03.01059.
  55. Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the Industry 4.0 revolution on human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability, 12(10), Article 4035. DOI:10.3390/su12104035.
  56. Sindhu, S., & Kumar, R. (2022). Modeling the challenges for agri-food supply chain 4.0: TISM approach. Agri-Food 4.0, Vol, 27.
  57. Ugwu, P., C., (2019). Women in agriculture: challenges facing women in African farming. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paula-Ugwu/publication/332053861/
  58. Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive Statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine 4(1):60. DOI: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_18
  59. Young, J.C., Rose, D.C., Mumby, H.S., Benitez-Capistros, F., Derrick, C.J., Finch, T., Garcia, C., Home, C., Marwaha, E. Morgans, C., Parkinson, S., Shah, J., Wilson, K.A. & Mukherjee, N. 2018. A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Qualitative Methods for Eliciting Judgements for Decision Making, January 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12828.
Read More

Author Biographies

Phindile Cebekhulu-Msomi, Milpark Business School

Department of Business Studies, Milpark Business School

Shamila Singh, University of South Africa
Unique Consulting Solutions and

Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, School of Business Leadership – UNISA,

Johannesburg, South Africa;
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.